Displacement, Substitution, Superimposition

By The Pathwork Guide

Greetings, my dearest friends. God bless everyone of you. Blessed be this lecture. Blessed be every step toward growth and unfoldment that each one of you undertakes. May the progress continue by those of my friends who are already deeply involved in this Path of self-confrontation. And may those of you who did not as yet find their way into this path in a more direct way find the realization and enlightenment necessary to start the work within themselves.

In this lecture I should like to discuss a subject that has come up before here or there, but which is not fully understood in its deeper significance by any of you. This is the topic of displacement, substitution, and superimposition of feelings and needs. I believe that this subject deserves a more careful scrutiny and understanding. I can see that, particularly at this time, it is essential for all of you to realize this in order to make further progress. I can also see that some of my friends find themselves at the present time in negative involvements which they cannot fully understand, and therefore cannot resolve, unless this vital factor is recognized specifically -- as it applies to each individual.

Whenever a person is confused in a situation, negatively involved in a relationship, and cannot come out of a disturbed feeling -- in spite of certain recognitions -- it is an absolute sign that certain emotional needs or specific feelings have been shifted into different channels, or superimposed by other feelings. No matter how deep a problem or how severe a fault, it could never create a deep, abiding disturbance if the person were completely aware of it in its original form -- without displacing, superimposing, or substituting feelings other than the genuine ones.

As you know from my previous talks, each emotion, each feeling, each thought, each attitude, and each need is an energy current. There are many different types of energy, corresponding to the type of feeling or need. A full, rich life in the integrated individuality expresses many different needs, feelings, and outlets -- not just a few. The more integrated a person is, the less do these various needs interfere with one another and the less friction do they cause within and outside the life of the person. The healthy life requires fulfillment in many directions, and it is possible to attain this manifoldedness for which the entity is destined by nature. Exclusion of certain fulfillments at the expense of others is the result of erroneous unconscious concepts, limited understanding, and lack of self-awareness. In the healthy psyche one type of self-expression supports and strengthens the other -- rather than cause conflict. For example, displacement and superimposition result in a conflict between the need for vocational self-expression and the need for mutuality in a love relationship; the need for solitude and the need for companionship; the need for physical activity and the need for mental activity; the need for sexual and for creative expression; the need for self-assertion and the need for flexible adjustment; the need for ego gratification and the need for unselfishness. These and many other apparently contradictory needs and self-expressions can harmoniously live side by side in healthy interaction only if there exists no confusion as to the rightfulness and fundamental genuineness of these different forms of expression, so that no superimpositions and displacements occur. What appears as a contradiction to the conflicted, blind person is no contradiction in reality, but merely proof of the richness and manifoldedness of Creation.

It is the belief that a need or a feeling is necessarily wrong that eventually makes it wrong. However, one's wavering uncertainty, fear, guilt, and shame about the existence of a feeling one believes one should not have -- while actually suffering the thwarting of its needs and the necessity to do so -- creates an unhealthy climate that makes the very healthiest emotional need into something bad. This fact requires hiding, denying, repression. Since the existing energy does not dissolve into thin air but seeks an outlet, like a stream, the original energy converts into a different type -- a displacement. Or else it changes into its opposite, due to the feeling that the original emotional need is unacceptable.

It is very important to become aware of what may seem like two contradictory needs and to realize that they are not necessarily so, but actually a part of a full life.

The most prevalent denial, due to false guilt, is in the area of receiving. Anything you wish to attain for yourself often causes a vague feeling that this is wrong. Just because the need to receive is completely disapproved of and denied, its counterpart, the need to give -- as part of a rich, healthy, and fulfilled life -- cannot grow into maturity. Denying the need to receive causes the psyche, in this respect at least, to remain childishly selfish, so that a one-sided greed exists. This may be superimposed with a false, compulsive giving which, just because it is superimposed and not the result of natural growth, brings disharmony, resentment, self-pity, and unjust exploitation.

A good example is what, in a different context, I discussed about man's need for sexual expression. Due to false guilt, the sexuality remains selfishly childish and is, therefore, unable to melt with the need to give and receive love and affection. Consequently, the need for sex is denied and superimposed with substitute needs.

Feeling erroneously guilty about the natural need to receive automatically impairs one's capacity to give -- no matter how forcefully and artificially giving may be practiced in order to squelch the gnawing guilt. This impairment encourages the false assumption that wanting to receive is wrong, thereby increasing the denial, the displacement, the substitution. To recapitulate: unfree, compulsive, problematic giving is often the result of denying a need to receive. The latter may be overgrown and disproportionately strong just because it is thought to be wrong and bad. It has to be specifically ascertained in each individual case and in what particular respect of one's personality this holds true. By unrolling this whole process, taking cognizance of it, a great deal of relief is given to the soul.

The following conflict regarding giving and receiving frequently exists. There is the compulsion to give and the guilt for receiving. These two emotions may be comparatively easy to recognize. In connection with this factor, the person feels unfairly treated, exploited, victimized, and resentful, while still being unable to stop the compulsion to give and the guilt for desiring to receive. He is faced with the unsatisfactory alternative of either giving and resenting it, or receiving and feeling unfree, inhibited, and guilty about it. He cannot find his way out of this predicament. If such is the case, you may be sure, my friends, that you have not faced an underlying selfish, one-sided greed; nor have you fully understood that this greed is merely the result of a confusion, which ignores the fact that you are indeed entitled to receive something. If this is worked through, your giving will be freer and so will your ability to receive.

I said before that if the original fault were fully conscious, there would be comparatively little disturbance. Let us apply this truth to this particular facet of the human psyche. If the person could clearly see the childish, greedy selfishness, expressing: "Since I am so selfish that I want everything for myself, I do not deserve to receive," the conflict would cease, even before the greedy selfishness entirely disappears. The mere fact of being aware of it, its consequent conclusion, and self-denial would enable the person to reason, and to understand, that although the hitherto hidden one-sidedness is unfair, the subsequent measure against it -- complete self-denial -- is equally unfair in the opposite extreme.

Whether it concerns the aspect of giving and receiving, or any other legitimate need and self-expression, hidden one-sidedness often creates overt one-sidedness in the opposite extreme. This form of substituting the disapproved need or emotion with its opposite is very frequent and at the bottom of many a conflict which, in spite of various recognitions, does not dissolve.

Let us take another current problem, self-assertion. Suppose a man feels guilty about expressing his healthy masculine aggressiveness confusing it with unhealthy hostile aggressiveness. He finds himself in the following predicament and conflict. He desists from expressing his natural need for masculine self-assertion in the confusion that this makes him wrong. Consequently he emasculates himself. His weakness causes self-contempt and resentment for others, whom he blames for the unpleasant results of his weakness. Or, he expresses aggressiveness and, just because he vaguely feels that this is "unkind" or "unspiritual," he wavers. This wavering, in itself, makes the expression of self-assertion, independence -- of natural, healthy aggressiveness -- problematic, because his own attitude to it is uncertain, consciously or unconsciously. But, in addition, his resentments -- the result of suppressing his natural aggressiveness -- now mingle with the confusion, so that he no longer expresses its healthy facet, but, indeed, a negative version of it.

Often my friends on the path have come to the point where they recognize the conflict -- both unsatisfactory alternatives: weakness versus hostility -- but they cannot find their way out until they find that they denied their original need for expressing natural masculine aggressiveness while ignorant of the fact that it is a healthy need. When they give it a right to exist, they will have no reason for feeling hostile -- in this particular respect and problem area -- so that expressing it will not create guilt. They will also be able to make the distinction between the rightfulness of this need and the equal rightfulness of a need for interdependency, relinquishing, and flexibility. These latter aspects are most ardently denied by the person who weakens himself due to the above mentioned misconception. He substitutes for the weakness and shame its concomitant, an exaggerated strength, confusing flexibility, adjustability, the ability to take advice with weakness, and rigid stubbornness with "strength." He constantly wavers between giving in at the wrong time and place -- because he disapproves of his aggressive tendencies -- and asserting himself where reason would show him that to do so is detrimental.

In addition to substituting the opposite trend for the one that is denied, another current form of displacement is the shifting of the need into another channel. Wherever there is an exaggerated involvement -- an involvement which disrupts inner and/or outer peace, an involvement that leaves other important functions in life unfulfilled -- one may be sure that such a shift has indeed taken place. Let us, once again, take some illustrative examples. An over-concern with one's creative abilities hardly leaves room for other needs to express themselves -- regardless of how constructive such self-expression may be in itself. Such over-emphasis may be an indication of a denied need in another area of the personality. The resultant inner friction may become noticeable only gradually, after extensive progress in self-awareness. Tension, frustration, discontent, unexplainable hostility, over-reaction -- to the degree of even seeing that the intensity of the feeling is not commensurate with the occasion, and yet being unable to prevent it -- or numbness and the impoverishment of feelings in other areas are frequent indications of the inner friction, the result of denying a rightful need. Outer friction with one's environment is often a further result.

There are many reasons possible for denying or ignoring the rightfulness of the original need, but whatever the specific circumstances -- early influences, personal images -- may be, it has to be recognized that this original need does exist, even though one fears to acknowledge it. At certain periods during one's past life the need may have clearly manifested. It may now manifest in the displacement area. If you are truly desirous to know the truth about yourself, then it will not be too difficult to synchronize the feelings of the original denied need and the feelings in connection with the substitute needs. Doing so brings immeasurable relief and peace.

You may be frightened of love and substitute the need for it with the expression of a talent. You ignore the fact that there is room for both -- and many more forms of expression -- in your psychic life. Hence your fear to acknowledge the original need forces you to abandon an, in itself, equally legitimate need. You may still lack the necessary information about your inner misunderstandings and misconceptions responsible for the fear of love. Hence you fear that you are forced to plunge into it when you recognize the existence of the need. Therefore you battle against recognizing the displacement -- or if you do, you do so only in a flat, intellectual way. You also ignore what harm you inflict upon yourself, apart from the perpetual starvation you expose yourself to. The harm, for example, is that any unfulfillment, hurt, rejection, disappointment causes -- in the displaced area -- an infinitely deeper suffering than the suffering connected with the original need. If you are fully aware of your psyche's expression: "I am still afraid of love. I do not yet fully understand why and therefore I am not ready to love and be loved. But I know that love is a universal need. What does its denial do to me? How do I really feel this lack? How many of my emotions, involved in the substitution, actually belong to the need for love?" Your growing peace, insight, and the ability to cope with issues you could not previously cope with will prove how essential it is to live in truth. You gain full possession of yourself, even though you may still shirk love, if not truth. You will prevent needless real guilts and unnecessarily putting yourself under the power of detrimental influences, which merely encourage that in you which is so harmful.

Shifting original needs into different channels may take various forms, apart from the example cited above. Fear of love may, in other personalities, create an over-emphasis, an exaggerated need for purely sexual expression. A compulsion for sex may also be a denial of one's need to assert oneself, or of one's need to execute a creative talent. An unbalanced, one-sided need for spirituality and seclusion may be the manifestation of displaced needs in any of the aforementioned aspects: fear of love, of sex, of self-assertion, of vocational expression. The fear, I repeat, is the result of ignoring the fact that all these, and more, needs are, in healthy interaction, natural and universal, and therefore not any cause for guilt and denial.

A generally ignored need is that of ego gratification. The most enlightened people are under the impression that to have a need for it at all indicates neurosis, disturbance, immaturity. In the well-functioning personality, the need for it is acknowledged, but it is not exaggerated -- at the expense of other functions and expressions of the self. Lack of the ability to give the ego its necessary gratification is a result of ignoring its healthy, unexaggerated existence. Being dependent on others who then fall short of fulfilling this need is a sign that the self disregards its rightful place in the overall scheme. However, if you are able to acknowledge, "I do need some measure of approval, some degree of gratification of my ego," then chances are that, provided you do not feel guilty about it, ways will begin to open offering you this fulfillment. And it will certainly be infinitely easier to find certain factors within yourself which prohibited the fulfillment of this need, certain destructive behavior patterns you could not see, before you can guiltlessly acknowledge this need.

It is of the utmost importance, my friends, to ascertain all your needs -- to what extent they are fulfilled and to what extent they are unfulfilled. Think about the variety of universal needs, and then look inside to see if you have given all of them a rightful place. Ascertain about which particular needs you feel guilty and ashamed. Ascertain which needs must remain unfulfilled due to your personal images, your main problems, your unresolved conflicts, your pseudo solutions, and your idealized self-image. Look further into the possibilities of your personal displacements. In what way -- substitution by the opposite or shifting the need or the denied feeling into different channels -- and to what extent. Then look at them from the opposite approach: regard your present negative involvements, disturbing emotions, and impasses that you cannot extricate yourself from because the available alternatives of inner and outer reaction are equally unsatisfying What possible real needs are at the bottom of such a nucleus? What needs have grown disproportionately strong due to denial and false guilt?

The value of such an approach to yourself cannot be measured, my friends. I can see that for all of you it is of the utmost importance to undertake this step. Many a lingering negative situation, interrupted on the way toward having gained some understanding but being unable to come out of it, is the result of ignoring this vital step. After extensive insight has been made, your permanent personality problems and unfulfillments often require only the final approach of this subject before a true liberating transformation can take place. It is also the best way to increase your ability to accept yourself in a spirit of realism.

Displacement and substitution occur not only with one's fundamental problems, main images, and inborn conflicts -- all waiting for the necessary understanding in order to be resolved -- but they also apply to temporary situations. After a poignant disappointment, an individual may deny a hitherto accepted need and subsequently shift the respective energy into a different outlet. It goes without saying that a fundamental personality problem may, in some way, be connected with this way of reacting, nevertheless the displacement may not be permanent. It is of equal importance to be aware of situational displacements, otherwise a permanent denial of a need and a substitution may come into existence.

Such temporary displacements may occur, particularly in the course of this pathwork, as an interim phase. Let us again take an example. Suppose you have a problem in regard to a partnership relationship, a difficulty in relating to the opposite sex. Let us further suppose that before you have started and progressed on this path, in spite of the existence of this problem, your pseudo solutions, your idealized self-image, and your defense mechanisms have given you some measure of fulfillment. Of course, such fulfillment was limited, problematic, fraught with tension, and, in the end, disappointing -- for it cannot be otherwise if one attempts to solve a problem by false means. But, nevertheless, there was some measure of fulfillment. Progress in this pathwork has begun to dissolve, to a considerable extent, the pseudo solutions, the idealized self-image, and the defense mechanisms, but the original problem may not yet be fully worked through and understood on the deepest levels of your being. Nor are you quite conscious of your needs and their rightful place in your life. Hence, you find yourself in the interim in a transitory stage, which may confuse even you, because you know that you have grown, while experiencing a greater emptiness than ever before -- in this specific area of your life. You do not quite know why this is so. Your needs are now less fulfilled than before, but since you do not concisely acknowledge this fact, the energy current shifts into another outlet.

Not being aware of the original need, and its present unfulfillment, is bound to cause it to attach itself to another situation. Perhaps it produces a tight over-involvement with your work, where there are now too many intense reactions. Or perhaps it produces an over-involvement with a specific friendship, into which all the feelings and needs are shifted.

It does not suffice to be generally aware of the unfulfilled need of a mutual relationship, the need of a mate. It has to be specifically recognized that several needs are imbedded in this expression. For instance, apart from the pleasure principle, there is the need for being needed and important; the need to give and receive; the need to be protective or protected, or both; the need for ego gratification. All these are legitimate needs, provided they are not overgrown and one is not disproportionate to another. For example, if the need for ego gratification in a partnership is disproportionately stronger than the need to give and receive love, affection, and pleasure, then such an imbalance has to be recognized and the reason found. But even if all these various needs, in this one form of expression, are healthy in interaction but ignored in such a temporary phase, then the entire nucleus of needs might be blindly shifted into another outlet. All these needs might experience a measure of fulfillment in the new transferred area -- in a different form, of course. Being fully aware of the substitution will make the shift harmless, even healthy and necessary. But ignoring the process must create untold and unnecessary hardship and confusion.

If a boss, an employee, a person you work for, a friend, or a group of people, or an activity or interest are supposed to furnish you with all the unfulfilled needs of the missing mate, then you must become overly tense, hostile, and insecure. Every little slight, or apparent slight, will hurt much more than if you were aware of what goes on in you. Such awareness will make you joyfully accept those fulfillments that can be substituted for, but will not make you expect what cannot possibly be expected -- therefore avoiding disappointment and frustration.

I do not mean to imply that the pleasure principle can be displaced into another outlet in its original form, of course not. It transforms itself. A hankering after luxuries may be such a transformation, or a craving for food or drink. Full awareness of this will lessen the intensity and strain, even if the displaced need has to find some outlet until it can be fulfilled in its natural way.

Let us take one more example, assuming your main problem is a difficulty to make the best of yourself. In the course of this work you have found and dissolved the idealized self-image, the pseudo solutions, etc. Hence, the small, precarious success you had before is temporarily lessened. You now find it harder to assert yourself because the defenses no longer work, while you have not yet found the clarity of acknowledging your real needs without the fear of imagined dire consequences and false guilt. You now understand that your previous and limited accomplishments were no satisfactory solution. They were fraught with tension and anxiety, and in the end ventures always failed, without your really seeing why. Now you know. But you are not yet in a position to express your abilities and talents without conflict and uncertainty. It takes a little more insight and understanding before you can do so. In this interim phase, in which you find yourself more frustrated than before, the respective needs are left without any outlet. Unconsciously you seek a substitute channel.

Again, it is important to recognize the various needs connected with this one issue of vocational self-expression. Apart from the need to make a living -- which is the most obvious and most readily recognized -- there are others: the need for creative accomplishments; the need for ego gratification and self-esteem; the need for carrying responsibility and coping with a challenge; the need for the pleasure of accomplishment; the need for self-assertion, as well as the need for cooperation and interaction. Provided one need is not disproportionate to others, all of them have their rightful place and should not cause guilt. By not acknowledging these needs, they are displaced into a relationship, a side activity. As in the former example, the fact of doing so cannot harm, provided you are fully aware of it. This prevents you from undue over-reaction, tension, frustration, and the inner disorder and imbalance which are always the result of the lack of self-awareness.

Look at your present activities and relationships in this light. Ascertain any possible over-reaction, lingering or frequently recurring anxiety, and other negative emotions. Then examine and ponder the needs behind. It will then become possible to find and clearly determine the displacement. It is particularly important to then ascertain to what degree you feel you ought not to have these needs, and whether or not they are distorted due to denial.

It is essential to verify the various layers of superimposition and substitution. The more these various layers are emotionally experienced and understood in their true significance, the sooner can fulfillment occur. However, the frustration of needs does not hurt half as much, in actuality, as the fact that, consciously or unconsciously, one thinks that frustrated needs are painful. This is one of the predominant reasons for repressing needs -- thereby believing that they cease to exist. Thus the imagined pain of frustration is supposed to be eliminated while, in reality, the displacement and substitution result in much more severe and bitter suffering than would the relaxed admission of an unfulfillment.

Let us now consider the possibility of these various layers of substitution. Originally the need exists. This is one layer. But you may unconsciously, or vaguely half consciously, feel that you, as a mature and good person, ought not to have it. You therefore deny its existence. This denial is the next layer. In order to make the denial successful, you over-produce its opposite. You not only try to convince yourself that the need is nonexistent, but you prove it by emphasizing the opposite. This, then, becomes compulsive -- just because of the process involved. That is the third layer. As a further result, there must come resentment, dissatisfaction -- the fourth layer. As a fifth, guilt about the resentment. As a sixth, there is confusion, because all of these powerful emotions cannot be dealt with. They are merely a result of denying the original need or feeling.

Displacement, as discussed here, is horizontal, as it were. One layer covers the other. Vertical displacement is when one substitutes one form of self-expression with another. Compulsiveness is also the result of vertical shifts, just as in the horizontal ones. The intensity of preoccupation, resulting from such displacements, applies to both forms.

If you are afraid to be rejected in love and, subsequently, displace the respective energy current into the channel of vocational success, then the slightest real or imagined rejection in that field hurts infinitely more than a real rejection in the original area.

Discussing such a topic must, perforce, happen in an over-simplified way. When it comes to the dynamics of the human psyche there are many details which must be taken into consideration and it ceases to be a question of clear-cut denial or admission. It is often somewhere in-between -- a half measure, which is no more satisfactory than a complete lack of awareness of these processes.

If you find yourself in an involved situation and you examine yourself from the point of view under discussion, the mere fact that you acknowledge your needs, even though you may not yet be able to distinguish between distorted and healthy needs and emotional attitudes, acknowledge them for better or for worse. This is bound to relieve the involved situation of surplus intensity and painfully twisted and conflicted emotions. You may try with all your might to understand a painful and involved situation by analyzing yourself and the other person, but as long as you do not find peace, you may be sure that something has been displaced.

Seeing this over and over again with all of my friends -- with some to a greater, with some to a lesser degree -- makes this lecture of special importance. Regardless of how good your will is and how sincerely you try, you still often fail to look in the right direction. Much of what I constantly tell you is forgotten at the time.

I recently discussed the topic of transference. Of course, transference is also a form of displacement or substitution. But often this term is not recognized in its full significance and its various details. Displaced needs are also a sort of transference of them -- just as one may displace, or transfer, the feelings one originally had for a parent to another person. I discussed in the lecture dealing with transference that it is necessary to determine a negative feeling toward a person which is persistent and cannot be resolved by finding that you originally felt in a similar way toward a parent, but did not dare to acknowledge this. The moment you now feel the original feeling toward the parent in connection with the new person, the negatively involved situation must clear up -- while you have grown considerably in this process of facing the truth within yourself. This is the identical mechanism with displaced feelings and needs.

Are there any questions now?

QUESTION: I have the feeling that, due to my childhood, there exists in me a childish greed which manifests by a need for special consideration now. Do I displace or superimpose this original need?

ANSWER: Yes, you are quite right. You so completely denied this childhood greed until recently that you go way overboard by denying yourself every gratification and fulfillment. You feel extremely guilty, not only due to this still undeveloped part in yourself in which the childish greed exists, but also due to the legitimate, rightful desire to receive. You feel just as guilty about the one as about the other. Therefore you go way overboard in denying yourself any gratification.

The fact that you can even ask this question indicates a tremendous step forward for you and a vast new opening of insight into yourself, of clarification. This will prove of more crucial importance than you even realize at this moment.

QUESTION: In an involvement with a new person, how can one be sure that it is not a question of transference of the parent?

ANSWER: One can be sure only by deeply examining one's feelings and ascertaining the parallels, the similarities of reactions. But a relationship need not be shied away from because it may also contain elements of transferred emotions. Not only can one grow in such a relationship, particularly when being alert to oneself, but it is seldom the case that spontaneous, direct feelings toward the real person in question do not also exist, which might make the relationship rewarding for both. To the degree one recognizes oneself, to that degree the relationship will grow more real and less a repetition of old patterns.

I would also like to advise that you examine your unconscious motivations for this question, in that you might have hoped to hear that it is indeed "merely" a transference, and therefore no good. This might appear to imply certain disturbing questions.

This topic, although not entirely new, may open more new doors for many of my friends than a completely new topic at this time. It is essential for all of you to work through.

Let me go from you with loving, warm blessings for each one of you, in your own way -- also for those who read this lecture. May all of you receive and feel this love, even if some of my friends may, due to their current problems and misunderstandings and their temporary involvements making them blind, not realize how much I am with them and for them. Be blessed, be in peace, be in God.


The Guide
by Eva Pierrakos
January 10, 1964

Copyright 1964, the Center for the Living Force, Inc.

Back