QUESTION: I would like to understand a little more concretely about this marriage between the forces of love and circumstances of, for example, cruelty. For instance, in a case of a child who feels rejected by his mother. In this case, does the "marriage" then mean that the person cannot experience pleasure unless he also experiences revenge -- some kind of sadistic wish toward the mother? (Perhaps only in fantasy, never in reality, and then the person is usually unaware of the fact that the partner represents the mother).
ANSWER: Yes, it might be exactly that. Or it might be that pleasure can be experienced only in connection with being rejected again, or a little rejected, or being fearful that rejection may occur.
QUESTION: But he didn't experience pleasure when he was rejected.
ANSWER: Of course not. But the child uses the pleasure principle in order to make the negative event, the suffering, more bearable. This happens unconsciously, unintentionally, and almost automatically. Inadvertently, as it were, the pleasure principle mingles and combines with the negative condition. The only way this can be determined is by investigating one's fantasy life. In that way the "marriage" is established. The automatic reflexes are then geared to a situation that combines the inherent pleasure with the painful event.
QUESTION: And he wishes to reproduce this rejection?
ANSWER: He does not consciously wish this, of course. No one really wants to be rejected. The trouble is that he consciously wishes to be accepted and loved, but unconsciously he cannot respond to a completely accepting and favorable situation. The pleasure principle has already been led into the negative channel and can be re-channeled only through awareness and understanding. The very nature of his conflict is that his pleasure principle functions in a way he consciously wants to avoid. It cannot be said that he unconsciously desires rejection, but the reflex had already been established at a time when this way of functioning made life more bearable for the child. Do you understand that?
QUESTION: I don't quite understand how pleasure can be experienced at all when someone is rejected, except in the form of revenge. That I can understand.
ANSWER: Perhaps you can imagine also -- one sees this over and over again -- that when someone feels too secure in being accepted and loved, he loses the spark of interest. This, too, is rationalized by claiming it to be an inevitable law, happening through habit, etc. But it does not have to be that way, if it were not for the factors discussed in this lecture. The spark, the interest, the dynamic flow exists only when there is an unsure, or an unhappy situation. You see this frequently. Sometimes the negative condition exists only in fantasies. These fantasies are, in one way or another and when closely examined, attached to suffering, humiliation, hostility, or whatever. This is then called masochism or sadism. Do you understand now?
QUESTION: Yes, I think I do. Since every child experiences rejection, and since every child is insatiable in his demands, when will there be an end to this situation? Because it always starts with each incarnation, and each situation again?
ANSWER: You can see that there is differentiation among human beings. There are those who function in a much healthier way, where the pleasure principle responds more strongly to a positive situation. This is the evolution taking place. When a completely positive situation exists in the psyche, then reincarnation is no longer necessary. Evolution then proceeds on other levels. To a certain degree, every human being has negativity and this negativity is somehow activated, enforced, and nourished by the life principle. But degrees exist, and they are a clear indication of the evolutionary process. For, you have those human beings, at one extreme, who cannot even have any direct relationship with another person; who live merely in fantasies, which are utterly attached to negative experiences. On the other hand there are those human beings who, in the course of their growing up, in the process of maturing, have brought fantasy life and reality life, in the most positive and favorable sense, together. I discussed this in another context. In this connection, this bringing together of fantasy and reality does not mean repression of fantasy life, but true overcoming of it, because reality is more desirable and more pleasurable, just as positive circumstances are. Between these two poles, many degrees exist. By that, you can the evolutionary progress.
QUESTION: Does mobility and tension, and relaxation and stagnation lessen as you remove the pleasure principle from the negative?
ANSWER: Of course, they interact. You can see how this interaction, to the extent that there is a combination or a "marriage" or a melting between the positive life or pleasure principle and a negative situation, brings tension and anxiety. To the extent that anxiety and tension exist, immobility appears a welcome relief to the strain of moving away from the self. When such a short-circuit hinders the real experience of the pleasure principle, stagnation is the result. It is a non-movement, whereas the whole cosmos is in perpetual, beautiful motion. When man, within his own psyche, establishes the same cosmic movement, he is in harmony with the cosmic forces.
QUESTION: This is the clearest understanding I have ever had of what has happened to me in this "marriage" of negativity and the pleasure principle, of having set up a rejection. Seeing it as clearly as I do now, recognizing exactly how it operates, what do I do about it further?
ANSWER: It is extremely important that you become aware of the specific negative condition to which the pleasure principle in you reacts. This awareness must be not only intellectual, but you must actually feel and experience this mechanism within yourself. You must allow yourself this awareness. Reach deep into your innermost self and remove the restriction to allow this into your consciousness. Realize that allowing it into your consciousness is not a devastating judgment over you. It is not the end of you. It does not stamp you as lost, as you unconsciously believe, but rather as the opposite. This is a new beginning and a way out of an erroneously assumed devastating judgment you thought applied to you. When you allow the clear-cut, concise formulation of this particular melting point into your emotional experience -- how the automatic reflexes of the pleasure principle are geared to the negative -- when you experience this with courage, knowing that this need not and will not remain, as you quietly and calmly desire to grow, then you cannot help but come forward.
The Guide
by Eva Pierrakos
June 25, 1965
Copyright 1965, by Eva Broch